Sustainability rules over future EU regional funds

The EU’s next budget is likely to include the first-ever binding document setting “stronger” and “clearer” objectives for regional funds to support sustainable development.

 

The European Commission is poised to adopt a communication next month which will channel EU regional funds into a set of specific environmentally friendly priorities – “the most important step” to date in combining different funds.

The legislation is “clearer and legally stronger than existing regulations”, said Markus Trilling of Friends of the Earth Europe.
“This time they have gone into detail, they explain in the various stages of projects’ implementation how they must respect sustainable development principles,” he said.
The 54-page document, seen by EurActiv, is the last document to finalise before starting regional funds’ negotiations for the 2014-2020 EU budget, or Multiannual Financial Framework. The document will be shortened by the end of the month since much of its content already exists in current legislation for cohesion policy, sustainable development and innovation.
The so-called Common Strategic Framework (CSF) 2014-2020 would set a management system between EU, national, regional and local authorities for the coordination of different funds earmarked for the same types of projects.
“It is a good tool to make sure we have coherence between funds and Europe 2020 goals,” said Trilling.

‘Focused’ commitments

“It is a starting point at EU level, a top-down approach that puts all the existing rules in one place,” said Danuta Hübner, chair of European Parliament regional development committee.
“This should enable a better use for the different funds, by combining them,” Ton Van Lierop, European Commission spokesperson said.
The CSF is seen as a step forward from the former National Strategic Reference Framework. The framework used to set priorities on how EU money should be spent, taking into account member states’ national reform agendas, but did not include rural development and fisheries funds and did not channel money specifically towards sustainable development.
The Commission is also trying with this document, to be adopted next month, to push through the so-called Partnership Contracts, which should “translate the elements set out in the Common Strategic Framework into the national context and set out firm commitments for the achievement of the Union objectives by programming CSF funds”, reads the text seen by EurActiv.
This implies member states will set measurable targets aligned with sustainable development indicators, which will be binding and countries will be accounted for in the implementation of the signed partnership contract.
In the draft proposal the Commission sets 11 such commitments to achieve smart and sustainable growth.
The objectives include research; innovation, enhancing access to, use and quality of telecommunications technologies; makings smaller businesses more competitive; supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy; promoting climate change adaptation; and resource conservation.
“This should reduce the number of environmentally harmful projects,” said Trilling. The activist gives a few examples of such “wasteful” projects: the Demir-Kapija Smokvica motorway in Macedonia that will be constructed in a pristine forest and that has serious issues related to the transparency of contracting, for example, or the Białystok airport in Poland that would damage the Biebrza and Narew national parks and their bird populations.
“The Common Strategic Framework 2014-2020 would really make a big difference by ensuring that member states obey environment policies,” Trilling said, adding that the Commission’s proposal should include a provision for stronger project monitoring as a condition for getting funds.

Focused approach to attract investors

The Common Strategic Framework will take either the legal form of a delegated act or that of an annex to already existing regulations, such as the Energy Efficiency Directive or the Cohesion Policy Regulation.
“The majority of the Council and the European Parliament want this to be adopted as an annex,” Hübner said, explaining this would make it legally stronger than any other existing document.
Tillburg agreed, but said that “there are many back doors in the Council”.
This strategy is to create incentives for investors, as it will guarantee the EU’s commitment to co-funding regional projects that fall under the sustainable development umbrella.
There are incentives to invest money in energy efficiency, innovation and energy infrastructure, Ton Van Lierop said, adding: “We want to see more private-public partnerhips.”
Hübner concurred, noting the private sector must be more involved, given the specificity of the new framework.
“We don’t want this document to be put on the shelf, like others,” said Hübner. “We want it to become a binding regulation. For the first time we have a chance to have a deeper accord between the budget and addressing climate change.”
“Plus, we will do this together with the fisheries and rural development funds, which is new”.

Change of behaviour

Tillburg said that the CSF should make people change their way of thinking regarding investment, taking into consideration the climate impact of their projects. That could trigger changes in behaviour, he said. “It’s not only about immediate gains, you have to offer money for these projects so that in time these obstacles will be overcome.”
Local or regional authorities could lead by example in this case. “Environment ministers and politicians dealing with EU funds will be forced to look at the same document,” Trilling said.
Although the CSF gives EU countries the opportunity to invest more money into low-carbon projects, “no one will eventually force them to do so”, said Trilling, stressing that there will no hiding behind the bush for those member states that complain they have no money to invest in energy efficiency, for example.
The final form of the Common Strategic Framework 2014-2020 will most likely be amended as EU members agree with the strategy, but complain it lacks clarity on combining funds, Hübner said.
Flexibility will play an important role, since operational programmes for regional funds need to take into account local interests and discussions in the Council are likely to be  difficult.
Hübner downplayed differences, saying she believes an integrated approach will be found.
“It is important to reduce burdens and obstacles for the Council and make sure we do not delay its implementation,” said Hübner, noting it will take up to a year for the framework to please everyone.

More info at:
 http://www.euractiv.com/

Croatian Center of Renewable Energy Sources (CCRES)

About CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES (CCRES)• was founded in 1988 as the non-profit European Association for Renewable Energy that conducts its work independently of political parties, institutions, commercial enterprises and interest groups, • is dedicated to the cause of completely substituting for nuclear and fossil energy through renewable energy, • regards solar energy supply as essential to preserve the natural resources and a prerequisite for a sustainable economy,• acts to change conventional political priorities and common infrastructures in favor of renewable energy, from the local to the international level, • brings together expertise from the fields of politics, economy, science, and culture to promote the entry of solar energy, • provides the opportunity to play a part in the sociocultural movement for renewable energy by joining the association for everyone, • considers full renewable energy supply a momentous and visionary goal - the challenge of the century to humanity. CCRES Željko Serdar Head of association solarserdar@gmail.com
This entry was posted in ALTERNATIVE, ALTERNATIVE ENERGY, CCRES, CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, GREEN ENERGY, HCOIE, HRVATSKI CENTAR OBNOVLJIVIH IZVORA ENERGIJE, PASSIVE ENERGY, RENEWABLE ENERGY, RENEWABLE ENERGY CENTER SOLAR SERDAR, RENEWABLES JAPAN STATUS REPORT, SOLAR SERDAR and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s