Financing aspects are dominating ongoing talks on the energy efficiency directive, but member states are keeping their hands firmly on their wallets, EurActiv has learned.

As negotiations over the energy efficiency directive reopen under the Danish EU Presidency, discussions are  focusing heavily on financing aspects.
However, several options floated by the European Parliament to break the deadlock already look like non-starters, EurActiv was told.
And opposition by some EU states is making a binding 20% energy efficiency target impossible, said Martin Lidegaard, Danish minister for climate, energy and building as he was speaking to a group of Brussels-based journalists in Copenhagen. 

Bendt Bendtsen, a Danish member of Parliament who is following the dossier for the European People’s Party (EPP) told EurActiv that funding mechanisms currently contemplated by Parliament will be blocked by the EU Council of Ministers, which represents the EU’s 27 member states.
“The provision on ear-marking of financing, such as national energy efficiency funds will not be part of the final piece of legislation,” Bendtsen said.
“It is generally quite difficult to convince member states to earmark funds,” explained Bendtsen, adding that “this has even been the case before the crisis emerged”.
“I feel that the council has a hard job ahead, the ball is really on their table,” he said.
Danes revive talks
Both the European Commission and Parliament were forced to change their position on the proposed energy efficiency directive in order to accommodate the Council’s views. Member sates first refused to sign up to binding targets on energy savings, which prompted the Commission to propose binding “measures” instead.
Now, the Council does not want binding measures either, Bendtsen said, “unless the targets are measured differently or there are opt-outs or something else”.
The Danish presidency was expected to meet the Council’s energy working group yesterday (10 January) for the first time since it took over the EU’s rotating presidency on 1 January. The Danes are hoping to piggy-back on discussions over the EU’s energy roadmap to 2050 in order to re-launch the stalled talks on the directive.
Funding to be discussed as part of the 2014-2020 EU budget
But financing issues are more likely to be addressed in wider talks over the EU budget for 2014-2020, the Multi-Annual Financial Framework (MFF), which covers areas such as research and regional funding.
The funding aspect of the directive “has to be seen in the full picture of the European Regional Development Fund and ‘Horizon 2020’ [research agenda], but should not necessarily be a part of the directive,” an EU official told EurActiv.
Member states are avoiding signing up to a specific wording on financing issues in the text of the directive, as they do not want to prejudge the ongoing negotiations over the EU’s budget for the 2014-2020 period, EurActiv understands.
The upcoming months will see “tough talks” on the proposed directive, with “a large majority of the European Parliament” wanting binding financial facilities in place to fund the energy efficiency measures and member states being reluctant to allocating further money.
The talks are “like a poker game” where governments keep their cards close to their chests, said Claude Turmes, a Green MEP from Luxembourg who is spearheading talks for the European Parliament.
Claire Roumet of Cecodhas, a federation promoting social housing in Europe, said financing issues were crucial as renovation work in homes help bring energy bills down for the poorest. “[The EED] is looking at more than just EU finance. Tapping money for energy efficiency is not touched fully by the MFF, because it does not take into consideration all alternative types of funding,” Roumet told EurActiv.
Roumet was also adamant that binding measures were necessary. ​“If there is an obligation without specific measures, it will never be complied with,” she said.
March vote in Parliament
Meanwhile, the European Parliament’s committee on industry, research and energy (ITRE), which has the lead on the dossier, has pushed back its vote on the draft text from 24 January to 28 February. A full parliamentary vote is expected to take place late March.
The delay can be explained by the huge number of amendments, with more than 1,800 changes proposed to the draft energy efficiency bill.
“The number of amendments shows just how important this directive is,” said Claude Turmes MEP. The industry committee aims to integrate all those into 60-70 compromise amendments for the final vote of the Parliament.
“We are entering the eye of the storm, we are trying to build alliances with friendly governments,” Turmes told EurActiv.
On financing aspects, he said he was optimistic: “We are very much still in the negotiations, it is still very probable that we will have a text on this issue of financing in the directive”.
The Green MEP said that the Parliament’s insistence on having financial facilities included in the text of the directive gives the Assembly “visibility” and allows it “to have a tough discussion on financing” with member states.
Targets to stimulate investment
And as financing aspects remain the most difficult part of the negotiation, some are trying to revive an old idea – making the EU’s 20% energy efficiency target legally-binding on the member states.
Proponents say a binding target would make it harder for countries to argue against energy efficiency funds, because they would be compelled to allocate some money from the EU budget to meet that objective.
“A way of seeing it is the spine is the target and the flesh is the European budget to add meat to the bone,” Sanjeev Kumar of environmental group E3G told EurActiv.
And even if the EU allocates some specific funds for energy efficiency, without targets investments might remain scarce, efficiency advocates argue.
The European Commission’s last report on how the 2007-2013 budget was spent says that “certain energy and environmental investments are not progressing  as expected” and this must be redressed by the member states and regions.
“The direction for 10-20 years is vital so that you can cast these investments over a longer time,” Kumar said. “It gives people certainty that their efforts will not be reversed,” he added.
Claude Turmes, the Green MEP, agrees. “The more binding the target , the less risky the investment,” he said. “A clear target gives a bigger incentive to kick start investment. More flexibility and joint targets would make the energy efficiency directive easier to be agreed on,” Roumet added.
The  Danish presidency, described as “ambitious, but realistic”, its aim to finalise the so-called ‘trialogue’ talks between the European Commission, Council and Parliament on the energy efficiency directive during the first six months of 2012.